Mr. Gibbons' Report Card: One size fits most, bipartisan support for charters and athletic admins oppose competition

MrGibbonsReportCardRepublican Naysayers

The lower house in Mississippi voted down an education savings account bill this week that would have eventually created education savings accounts for up to 700 of the state’s 65,000 special needs students. Among the no votes: 11 Republicans, more than enough to cause the bill to fail 63-57.

According to the Clarion Ledger, Rep. Tom Weathersby, one of the Republicans voting no, stated, "I want to do everything I can to help students with special needs, but I feel like in our school districts we are capable of handling most of those needs.”

 Most of those needs? Most, but not all?

An education savings accounts program – which empowers new educational possibilities – would have better allowed the state to serve ALL needs. Isn’t that the goal?

Grade: Needs Improvement

 

Rep. George Miller

Rep. George Miller (D) and Rep. John Kline (R)

Rep. George Miller (D – California) and Rep. John Kline (R - Minnesota) came together this week to announce a federal bill that will provide startup funds for charter schools.

The bipartisan bill consolidates two federal programs for charter schools, and bumps funding from $250 million to $300 million a year. The new program will provide incentives for states to help develop charter schools and allow charter schools with proven track records of success to access grants in order to expand operations.

Rep. John Kline

The National Education Association opposes the bill on the grounds that the federal law won’t require charters to hold open meetings or disclose private donors – two things the teacher union, coincidentally, doesn’t do either.

The bill’s bipartisan support right out of the gate is a good indication of future success.

Grade: Satisfactory

 

Pennsylvania Interscholastic Athletic Association

There are covert ways to limit school choice and then there are overt ways.

The Pennsylvania Interscholastic Athletic Association (PIAA) has proposed one of the more obvious ways to limit choice short of banning it all together. It would outlaw charter schools from offering competitive sports if the local public school already offers that sport.

The only reason to propose such a bill is to keep athletes from transferring to charter schools.

The irony, of course, is that while the PIAA promotes healthy, safe and friendly rivalry between public school students, it wants to protect itself (and allies) from a little friendly competition.

Grade: Needs Improvement

About Patrick R. Gibbons

Patrick Gibbons is public affairs manager at Step Up for Students and a research fellow for the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice. A former teacher, he lived in Las Vegas, Nev., for five years, where he worked as an education writer and researcher. He can be reached at (813) 498.1991 or emailed at [email protected]. Follow Patrick on Twitter: at @PatrickRGibbons and @redefinEDonline.
magnifiercross linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram